Springe direkt zu Inhalt

David Merry

anonymes_bild

Ancient Philosophy (APhil)

Philosophy

Justificaton of Goodness in Antiquity

My research project focused on ancient ethics. That the debate in ancient ethics centered around an ongoing disagreement about what the best life was, has been well established. I explored the question of whether, behind this agreement, lay a deeper agreement about methodology: did the different schools (Stoics, Epicureans, Peripatetics) agree on what it would take to show that such and so was the best life, or did they disagree? If they agreed, what was the method they agreed on? If they disagreed, what different answers to the question did they offer, and did they try to overcome the disagreement? The texts I focused on included Seneca’s 87th letter, the third book of Aristotle’s Topics, various Epicurean texts, and Sextus Empiricus’ M XI.

2021
Ancient Greek and Roman Methods of Inquiry into the (Human) Good: https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/handle/18452/22311

Bjelde, J., Merry, D., Roser, C., Essays in Ancient Argumentation, Springer. 2021 

2018
Ratnayake, S., Merry, D. Forgetting Ourselves: Epistemic Costs and Ethical Concerns in Mindfulness Exercises, Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(8), 2018. 

2016
Philosopher and Dialectician in Aristotle’s Topics, History and Philosophy of Logic, 37(1), 2016.